Logo for Level Ahead ABA

Differential Reinforcement: What is DRI vs DRO vs DRA in ABA?

Author image

Laura NG, MA BCBA
Clinical Operations Manager

Differential reinforcement is a widely used strategy in applied behavior analysis (ABA) for modifying behavior. It involves reinforcing a target behavior while withholding reinforcement from unwanted behaviors. The goal is to replace undesirable behaviors with more desirable ones, making it a valuable tool in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. By using this technique, individuals can learn new behaviors and reduce problem behaviors effectively, making it an essential approach for addressing behavior problems.


In ABA, the concept of reinforcement is crucial. Reinforcement is a type of operant conditioning that increases the likelihood of a behavior occurring by providing a reward or removing an aversive stimulus after the behavior is displayed. The reinforcement serves as a consequence that strengthens the association between the behavior and its outcomes.


Differential reinforcement takes this concept further by specifically targeting and reinforcing certain behaviors while ignoring or withholding reinforcement for others. It aims to shape behavior by providing positive reinforcement for desired behaviors and extinguishing unwanted behaviors through the absence of reinforcement. This approach allows individuals to learn and adopt more appropriate behaviors in different ways.


There are different types of differential reinforcement procedures used in ABA, including Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior (DRA), Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior (DRI), and Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior (DRO). Each type has its own unique characteristics and applications in behavior change interventions.


Another type, Differential Reinforcement of Higher Rates of Behavior (DRH), focuses on increasing the frequency of a desired behavior. Additionally, there is Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates of Behavior (DRL), which aims to decrease the frequency of a behavior. Understanding these types of differential reinforcement, including DRL, can provide valuable insights into their implementation and effectiveness.


Understanding Differential Reinforcement in ABA

Differential reinforcement is a fundamental concept in behavior analysis, which is the scientific study of behavior and its underlying principles. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) is a field of psychology that utilizes these principles to create behavior change interventions.


The main purpose of differential reinforcement is to increase the occurrence of desired or appropriate behaviors while decreasing or eliminating undesirable behaviors. It involves systematically providing reinforcement for specific target behaviors and withholding reinforcement for undesired behaviors. This approach is based on the principle that behavior is influenced by its consequences. By manipulating the consequences of behavior, individuals can learn new behaviors and reduce problem behaviors.


In ABA, the target behavior is the behavior that the intervention aims to change or modify. It is important to clearly define the target behavior to ensure consistency and effectiveness in the intervention. The target behavior should be observable, measurable, and specific. For example, instead of targeting "aggression," the intervention may target "hitting others with closed fists."


Appropriate behavior refers to behaviors that are socially acceptable, desired, and functional. These behaviors promote positive interactions and outcomes for the individual. The goal of differential reinforcement is to replace inappropriate or undesirable behaviors with more appropriate behaviors. This can be achieved by identifying alternative behaviors that serve the same function or purpose as the unwanted behavior and reinforcing them through the use of an appropriate replacement behavior.


By understanding and implementing differential reinforcement techniques, behavior analysts and practitioners can effectively promote positive behavior change and improve the quality of life for individuals with behavioral challenges.


Types of Differential Reinforcement ABA

There are different types of differential reinforcement procedures used in ABA to address specific behavior change goals. These procedures vary in the type of behavior being reinforced and the strategies employed. The four most researched types of differential reinforcement are:


  1. Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior (DRA): This procedure involves reinforcing a specific alternative behavior that serves as a functional replacement for the unwanted behavior. The alternative behavior is identified based on its similarity or equivalence to the unwanted behavior.
  2. Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior (DRI): DRI focuses on reinforcing behaviors that are physically incompatible with the unwanted behavior. This means that the individual cannot engage in both behaviors simultaneously. By reinforcing the incompatible behavior, the unwanted behavior is effectively replaced.
  3. Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior (DRO): DRO reinforces any behavior other than the unwanted behavior. This procedure typically involves setting a specific time interval, and if the unwanted behavior does not occur during that interval, reinforcement is provided. DRO can be effective in reducing the frequency of unwanted behavior.
  4. Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates (DRL): DRL aims to decrease the frequency of a behavior by reinforcing it only if it occurs at a lower rate than a predetermined criterion. This procedure is often used when the goal is to reduce but not eliminate the behavior entirely.


Learning about what is DRI vs DRO vs DRA in ABA is important because these differential reinforcement procedures offer flexible and tailored approaches to behavior change interventions, allowing practitioners to address a wide range of behaviors and individual needs.


Exploring DRA: Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior

Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior (DRA) is a specific types of differential reinforcement ABA used to replace unwanted behavior with an alternative behavior that serves the same function or purpose. The goal of DRA is to reinforce a desirable behavior that can act as a functional and appropriate alternative to the unwanted behavior, also known as targeted behavior. This is achieved through the implementation of a DRA procedure, where the alternative behavior is reinforced while the unwanted behavior is not.


The alternative behavior chosen for reinforcement in DRA should be functionally equivalent to the unwanted behavior, meaning it serves the same purpose or achieves the same outcome. This ensures that the individual still meets their needs or goals but in a more appropriate manner.


DRA is especially effective in teaching and promoting socially acceptable behaviors, as it provides positive reinforcement for engaging in the desired behavior. By reinforcing the alternative behavior, practitioners can gradually increase its frequency and strength, while decreasing the occurrence of the unwanted behavior.


For example, if a child engages in tantrums when denied access to a preferred toy, the alternative behavior in DRA could be requesting the toy using a specific communication method, such as pointing or using a picture symbol. When the child engages in the alternative behavior, they receive the desired toy as a reinforcement, while the tantrum is not reinforced.


Over time, the child learns that engaging in alternative behavior is more effective in obtaining their desired outcome, leading to the skill acquisition of children with autism. DRA is a powerful tool in behavior change interventions, as it not only reduces problem behaviors but also promotes the development of more adaptive and functional behaviors.


DRA Examples

  • Example 1: A child engages in hitting when frustrated. The alternative behavior in DRA could be teaching the child to use a visual cue, such as a picture card, to request a break or express their frustration instead of resorting to hitting.
  • Example 2: A student interrupts others during class discussions. The alternative behavior in DRA could be teaching the student to raise their hand and wait for their turn to speak, providing them with positive reinforcement when they engage in this appropriate behavior.
  • Example 3: A teenager engages in self-injurious behaviors when feeling overwhelmed. The alternative behavior in DRA could be teaching the teenager to use a stress ball or engage in deep breathing exercises as a healthier coping mechanism, reinforcing these behaviors when they occur instead of the self-injurious behaviors.


In each of these examples, the alternative behavior serves as a replacement for the unwanted behavior and allows the individual to achieve their desired outcome or meet their needs more appropriately and adaptively. By reinforcing the alternative behavior, practitioners can effectively reduce the occurrence of unwanted behavior and promote positive behavior change.


However, it is important to note that differential reinforcement can also be used to decrease negative behaviors, such as aggression or self-injury, by reinforcing alternative, more appropriate behaviors. This approach is effective in promoting positive behavior change and reducing negative behaviors in individuals with developmental disabilities.


Benefits of Implementing DRA

Implementing Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior (DRA) offers several benefits in behavior change interventions. Some of the key benefits include:


  1. Promotion of positive behavior: DRA focuses on reinforcing desired behaviors, which promotes the development of positive and appropriate behavior patterns. By providing positive reinforcement for the alternative behavior, individuals are motivated to engage in the desired behavior more frequently.
  2. Replacement of problem behavior: DRA allows for the systematic replacement of problem behaviors with more adaptive and socially acceptable behaviors. The alternative behavior serves as a functional replacement for the unwanted behavior, allowing individuals to achieve their goals or meet their needs more appropriately.
  3. Reduction of problem behavior: By reinforcing the alternative behavior and withholding reinforcement for the unwanted behavior, DRA effectively reduces the occurrence of the problem behavior. Over time, with consistent implementation, the unwanted behavior becomes less frequent and eventually extinguished.
  4. Generalization of skills: DRA promotes the generalization of skills by teaching individuals to engage in alternative behaviors in various settings and situations. This allows for more flexible and adaptive behavior patterns, leading to greater independence and success in daily life.


By harnessing the power of positive reinforcement and providing appropriate alternatives, DRA can significantly impact behavior change and improve the overall functioning and well-being of individuals.


What is a DRI in ABA: Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior

Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior (DRI) is a behavior change procedure used in ABA to decrease or eliminate undesirable behaviors by reinforcing behaviors that are physically incompatible with the unwanted behavior. The goal of DRI is to make it impossible for the individual to engage in both behaviors simultaneously, effectively replacing the unwanted behavior with a more desirable alternative.


In DRI, the incompatible behavior is chosen based on its physical incompatibility with the unwanted behavior. This means that the individual cannot physically engage in both behaviors at the same time. By reinforcing the incompatible behavior and withholding reinforcement for the unwanted behavior, practitioners can effectively reduce the occurrence of the undesirable behavior.


For example, if a child engages in hitting when they are angry or frustrated, a physically incompatible behavior in DRI could be teaching the child to clench their fists or squeeze a stress ball as a substitute for hitting. By reinforcing the incompatible behavior, the child learns that engaging in the alternative behavior is more effective in managing their emotions and achieving their desired outcome.


DRI is a powerful technique for behavior change, as it not only decreases unwanted behaviors but also promotes the development of more appropriate and adaptive behaviors.


The Mechanism Behind DRI

Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior (DRI) operates based on the principles of behavior analysis, which focuses on the relationship between behavior and its consequences. In DRI, the mechanism behind the procedure involves reinforcing behaviors that are physically incompatible with the unwanted behavior, making it impossible for the individual to engage in both behaviors simultaneously.


By reinforcing the incompatible behavior and withholding reinforcement for the unwanted behavior, practitioners shape behavior and promote behavior change. The individual learns that engaging in incompatible behavior is more effective in achieving their desired outcome or meeting their needs.


DRI is often used to promote functional communication as an alternative to problem behaviors. For example, if a child engages in tantrums to obtain a preferred item, teaching the child to request the item using a communication system like picture cards or sign language would be an incompatible behavior.


By reinforcing the use of the communication system and withholding reinforcement for tantrums, the child learns that communication is more effective in obtaining their desired outcome, making it a valuable tool for individuals with developmental disabilities. The mechanism behind DRI is rooted in the principles of behavior analysis and relies on the power of reinforcement to shape behavior and promote positive behavior change.


Practical Examples of DRI in Action

  • Example 1: An individual engages in hair-pulling when feeling anxious. The incompatible behavior in DRI could be teaching the individual to engage in deep breathing exercises or squeezing a stress ball as a substitute for hair-pulling.
  • Example 2: A child engages in disruptive behaviors, such as throwing objects, when feeling frustrated. The incompatible behavior in DRI could be teaching the child to request a break or use a coping strategy like counting to ten when they feel frustrated.
  • Example 3: A student engages in self-stimulatory behaviors, such as hand-flapping, during class. The incompatible behavior in DRI could be teaching the student to engage in a more socially acceptable behavior, such as writing or drawing, as a substitute for hand-flapping.


In each of these examples, the incompatible behavior is chosen based on its physical incompatibility with the unwanted behavior. By reinforcing the incompatible behavior and providing alternative outlets for the individual's needs or emotions, practitioners can effectively reduce the occurrence of unwanted behavior and promote more appropriate and adaptive behaviors.


Unpacking DRO: Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior

Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior (DRO) is a behavior change procedure used in ABA to decrease the occurrence of problem behaviors by reinforcing any behavior other than the unwanted behavior. The goal of DRO is to provide reinforcement when the unwanted behavior does not occur during a specific time interval.


In DRO, practitioners set a time interval and observe the individual's behavior within that interval. If the unwanted behavior does not occur during the interval, reinforcement is provided. The reinforcement serves as a consequence for not engaging in the unwanted behavior, promoting the occurrence of alternative and more appropriate behaviors.


One challenge with using this types of differential reinforcement ABA is the possibility of unintended reinforcement of other challenging behaviors. Since reinforcement is contingent only on the non-occurrence of the target behavior, individuals may engage in other challenging behaviors to obtain reinforcement. To address this, DRO is often applied with an aversive contingency to ensure effectiveness.


DRO is a valuable technique in behavior change interventions, as it allows practitioners to focus on reinforcing positive behaviors and reducing the occurrence of problem behaviors. By reinforcing alternative behaviors, individuals learn to engage in more adaptive and socially acceptable behaviors.


What are the 4 types of DRO?

There are four types of Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior (DRO) procedures commonly used in behavior change interventions. These types vary in the specifications of the reinforcement delivery and the time intervals used. The four types of DRO are:


  1. Whole-Interval DRO: Reinforcement is provided if the problem behavior does not occur during the entire interval.
  2. Momentary DRO: Reinforcement is provided if the problem behavior is not occurring at the end of each interval.
  3. Interval DRO: Reinforcement is provided if the problem behavior does not occur at any point during the interval.
  4. Spaced-Responding DRO: Reinforcement is provided if the problem behavior is not occurring after a specified number of responses have occurred during the interval.


By understanding the different types of DRO procedures, practitioners can select the most appropriate one for their behavior change goals and individual needs.


When and Why to Use DRO

Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior (DRO) is a valuable tool in behavior change interventions and is used in specific situations based on the behavior analysis of the target behavior.


This types of differential reinforcement ABA is typically applied when the goal is to decrease or eliminate a specific problem behavior by reinforcing any behavior other than the unwanted behavior. It is effective when the unwanted behavior occurs at a high frequency and reinforcement can be provided for periods when the behavior is absent.


DRO is often used in behavioral therapy and has been studied extensively in the field of applied behavior analysis. There are several reasons why DRO may be chosen as a behavior change procedure:


  1. Frequency reduction: DRO is effective in reducing the frequency of problem behaviors by withholding reinforcement for the unwanted behavior and providing reinforcement for periods when the behavior does not occur.
  2. Alternative behavior promotion: DRO promotes the development and reinforcement of alternative behaviors that are more acceptable and desirable. By reinforcing alternative behaviors, individuals learn to engage in more adaptive and socially acceptable behaviors.
  3. Simplicity and ease of implementation: DRO is relatively simple to implement, making it suitable for individuals with different skill levels and settings. It does not require complex procedures or extensive programming.


When considering the use of DRO, it is important to conduct a thorough behavior analysis to understand the function and context of the target behavior. This analysis helps determine whether DRO is the most appropriate procedure and provides insights into the reinforcement schedule and duration.


DRO ABA Examples

  • Example 1: A child engages in excessive talking during group activities. The DRO procedure could involve reinforcing if the child remains quiet for a specific time interval during the group activity.
  • Example 2: A teenager interrupts conversations frequently. The DRO procedure could involve reinforcing the teenager when they wait for an appropriate pause in the conversation before speaking, instead of interrupting.
  • Example 3: A young child engages in tantrums when denied access to preferred toys. The DRO procedure could involve reinforcing if the child plays with other toys or engages in appropriate play behaviors instead of tantrums.


In each of these examples, the DRO procedure is used to decrease the occurrence of problem behaviors by reinforcing alternative behaviors. By reinforcing for periods when the unwanted behavior does not occur, individuals learn to engage in more desirable behaviors in their daily lives.



What is DRI vs DRO vs DRA in ABA

Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior (DRI), Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior (DRO), and Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior (DRA) are three different types of differential reinforcement procedures used in ABA. While they all aim to reduce problem behaviors and promote more desirable behaviors, they differ in their specific strategies and applications.


  • DRI focuses on reinforcing behaviors that are physically incompatible with the unwanted behavior.
  • DRO reinforces any behavior other than the unwanted behavior.
  • DRA involves reinforcing a specific alternative behavior that serves as a functional replacement for the unwanted behavior.


Each type of differential reinforcement has its own benefits and considerations. The choice of procedure depends on the behavior analysis of the target behavior and the specific goals of the intervention.


Similarities and Differences

Differential reinforcement is a behavior management strategy that aims to replace problem behaviors with appropriate behaviors. The key similarity among the different types of differential reinforcement is the use of reinforcement to increase the occurrence of desired behaviors. However, they differ in terms of the specific behaviors being reinforced.


DRA (differential reinforcement of alternative behavior) focuses on reinforcing a specific alternative behavior that is functionally equivalent to the problem behavior. This means that the alternative behavior serves the same purpose for the individual as the problem behavior.


DRI (differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior) involves reinforcing a behavior that is physically incompatible with the problem behavior, meaning that the individual cannot engage in both behaviors simultaneously.


DRO (differential reinforcement of other behavior) reinforces any behavior other than the problem behavior. This strategy is often used when it is not possible to identify a specific alternative or incompatible behavior.

Overall, the goal of all three strategies is to reinforce appropriate behaviors while reducing problem behaviors, but they differ in the specific approach used.


Choosing the Right Strategy for Your Goals

When choosing the right differential reinforcement strategy, it is important to consider the specific goals and target behaviors. Behavior analysis plays a crucial role in identifying the function and maintaining variables of problem behaviors, which helps in determining the most appropriate strategy to use.


If the problem behavior has a specific alternative behavior that can serve the same function, DRA may be the best choice. This strategy focuses on reinforcing the alternative behavior while withholding reinforcement from the problem behavior.


In cases where the problem behavior and the alternative behavior cannot occur simultaneously, DRI is a suitable strategy. It reinforces behaviors that are physically incompatible with the problem behavior.


If it is difficult to identify a specific alternative or incompatible behavior, DRO may be used. This strategy reinforces any behavior other than the problem behavior, encouraging the individual to engage in a wider range of appropriate behaviors.


Ultimately, the choice of strategy depends on the specific behaviors and goals of the individual, and consulting with a behavior analyst can help determine the most effective approach.


Strategies for Implementing Differential Reinforcement

The implementation of differential reinforcement requires careful planning and expertise in behavior analysis. Here are some key strategies for effectively implementing differential reinforcement:


First, it is important to clearly define the target behavior that will be reinforced and the problem behavior that will be reduced. This involves conducting a functional behavior assessment to understand the function and maintaining variables of the problem behavior.


Once the target behavior is identified, it is crucial to determine the appropriate reinforcement to use. This can vary depending on the individual and the specific behavior. Reinforcers can be tangible rewards, social praise, or access to preferred activities or items.


Consistency is key in differential reinforcement. The reinforcement should be delivered consistently and immediately following the occurrence of the target behavior. This helps to strengthen the association between the behavior and the reinforcement.


Tracking and monitoring progress is essential. Behavior analysts often use data collection methods to measure the occurrence of the target behavior and the reduction of the problem behavior. This data helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the differential reinforcement strategy and make any necessary adjustments.


Lastly, collaboration with parents, teachers, and other caregivers is crucial for successful implementation. They play a vital role in reinforcing the target behavior and providing support and consistency across different environments.


Overall, the effective use of differential reinforcement requires the expertise of a behavior analyst, consistent reinforcement delivery, data collection, and collaboration with caregivers.


Best Practices for Success

Implementing differential reinforcement successfully involves following best practices to maximize its effectiveness. Here are some key best practices for success:


First and foremost, positive reinforcement should be used as the primary method of reinforcement. Positive reinforcement involves providing a reward or preferred consequence following the occurrence of the target behavior. This helps to strengthen the association between the behavior and the desired outcome.


Consistency in the application of differential reinforcement procedures is crucial. The reinforcement should be consistently delivered following the occurrence of the target behavior and withheld when the problem behavior occurs.


Data collection and analysis are essential for tracking progress and making informed decisions. Behavior analysts often use data collection methods to measure the occurrence of the target behavior and the reduction of the problem behavior. This data helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the differential reinforcement strategy and make any necessary adjustments.


Regular communication and collaboration with a behavior analyst are important for ongoing support and guidance. They can provide expertise in behavior analysis and help tailor the differential reinforcement procedures to the individual's specific needs.


By following these best practices, the implementation of differential reinforcement can be more effective in promoting desired behaviors and reducing problem behaviors.


Common Challenges and Solutions

While differential reinforcement can be an effective behavior management strategy, it is not without its challenges. Here are some common challenges that may arise and potential solutions:


One challenge is the occurrence of the problem behavior despite the use of differential reinforcement. In such cases, it may be necessary to reevaluate the reinforcement being used and consider alternative strategies or modifications to the differential reinforcement procedures.


Another challenge can be the unintentional reinforcement of other unwanted behaviors. When implementing DRO (differential reinforcement of other behavior), there is a risk that other challenging behaviors may occur and become reinforced instead. To address this, it is important to carefully select the reinforcement and closely monitor the occurrence of other behaviors, especially inappropriate behavior.


Punishment procedures can also pose challenges when used in conjunction with differential reinforcement. Punishment should be used sparingly and only when necessary, as it can have negative side effects and potentially disrupt the effectiveness of the differential reinforcement strategy. It is important to consult with a behavior analyst to ensure the appropriate use of punishment procedures if needed.


Regular monitoring and evaluation of the differential reinforcement procedures can help identify and address any challenges that arise. By making adjustments and seeking guidance when needed, the effectiveness of the differential reinforcement strategy can be maximized.


Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding the nuances of types of differential reinforcement ABA, which are DRI, DRO, and DRA is crucial for effective behavior modification. Each strategy offers unique benefits and applications, catering to different behavioral goals. By implementing these techniques thoughtfully and consistently, positive behavioral changes can be encouraged. It's essential to tailor the approach to individual needs for optimal results.


Embracing best practices and addressing common challenges ensures the successful implementation of these reinforcement strategies in various settings. Keep in mind the ethical considerations and choose the right strategy wisely to promote lasting behavioral improvements.


At Level Ahead ABA, we understand that navigating the different types of differential reinforcement (DRI, DRO, DRA) can feel overwhelming. Our Board-Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs) are experts in crafting individualized therapy plans that utilize the most effective DR technique for each child's specific needs. We conduct a thorough assessment to identify target behaviors and then design a program that incorporates the appropriate DR method, whether it's reinforcing incompatible behaviors, rewarding the absence of unwanted behaviors, or strengthening alternative behaviors.


We prioritize clear communication and collaboration throughout the process. This ensures you understand the chosen DR technique and feel empowered to actively participate in your child's progress. Contact Level Ahead ABA today for a free consultation. Let our experienced professionals guide you through differential reinforcement and help your child build essential skills for a brighter future.


Frequently Asked Questions


  • What are the main differences between DRI, DRO, and DRA?

    The main differences between DRI, DRO, and DRA lie in the specific target behaviors being reinforced. DRI focuses on reinforcing physically incompatible behaviors, DRO reinforces any behavior other than the problem behavior, and DRA reinforces specific alternative behaviors.

  • What are DRI DRO DRA Examples?

    Differential Reinforcement (DR) in ABA therapy uses reinforcement strategies to target behaviors. DRI (reinforcing incompatible behavior) focuses on rewarding actions that can't be done at the same time as the unwanted behavior (e.g., sitting quietly vs. pacing). DRO (reinforcing absence of behavior) rewards time intervals with NO unwanted behavior, while DRA (reinforcing alternative behavior) strengthens a desired behavior that serves the same purpose as the unwanted one (e.g., using words for needs vs. tantrums).

  • How do I decide which differential reinforcement strategy to use?

    The choice of differential reinforcement strategy depends on the specific goals and target behaviors. Conducting a behavior analysis and identifying the function and maintaining variables of the problem behavior can help determine the most appropriate strategy.

  • Can these strategies be used outside of a clinical setting?

    Yes, differential reinforcement strategies can be used in various settings, including everyday environments. They can be implemented by parents, teachers, and caregivers to promote appropriate behaviors and reduce problem behaviors in natural environments.

  • Are there any ethical considerations with differential reinforcement?

    Ethical considerations are important in the implementation of differential reinforcement. It is crucial to ensure that the reinforcement being used is appropriate and does not cause harm. Positive reinforcement should be the primary method of reinforcement.

  • Is DRA the same as DRI?

    No, DRA (differential reinforcement of alternative behavior) and DRI (differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior) are different strategies. DRA focuses on reinforcing a specific alternative behavior, while DRI involves reinforcing behaviors that are physically incompatible with the problem behavior.

Looking for Expert Help? We're Here for You!

Our compassionate and skilled team is devoted to enhancing your child's development through customized ABA therapy. Let us partner with you to create a supportive environment for your child's success. 

Discover how we can help your family thrive with expert ABA therapy.

Contact Us

Related Posts

A family sitting with an ABA therapist, an autistic girl shaking hands while holding a bear in NE.
By Laura NG, MA BCBA Clinical Operations Manager February 1, 2025
Learn the best strategies for communicating with parents in ABA therapy to build trust, encourage collaboration, and support their autistic child’s progress.
Autistic students sitting in a circle outdoors on a field, engaging in an activity in Nebraska.
By Laura NG, MA BCBA Clinical Operations Manager February 1, 2025
Discover the latest autism statistics in GA and NE for 2025, including prevalence rates, trends, and key insights that shape our understanding of autism today.
Steve Jobs on stage delivering a presentation, with an Apple logo displayed in the background.
By Laura NG, MA BCBA Clinical Operations Manager January 31, 2025
Did Steve Jobs have autism? Learn about the possible connection between Steve Jobs and autism, and how it may have influenced his genius and leadership.
An RBT aspirant searching RBT exam results on a laptop while holding an open book in Nebraska.
By Laura NG, MA BCBA Clinical Operations Manager January 31, 2025
Unsure if you passed your RBT exam online? Learn how to check your results and what steps to take next in the certification process. Get the details here!
BCBA student seated at a table, holding a mock BCBA exam while studying on a laptop in Georgia.
By Laura NG, MA BCBA Clinical Operations Manager January 31, 2025
Learn common reasons many people fail the BCBA exam and uncover strategies and tips to boost your chances of success. Start preparing effectively today!
Autistic children sitting at a table, engaging in a discussion with smiles and a chalkboard in GA.
By Laura NG, MA BCBA Clinical Operations Manager January 29, 2025
Discover strategies for promoting neurodiversity in autism education. Learn how inclusive practices foster a supportive learning environment for all students.
More Posts
Share by: